Telecom provider 2017 - Climate Protection Question 10

From RankaBrand
Jump to: navigation, search

<<back to Telecom provider question list.
Previous: Telecom provider 2017 - Climate Protection Question 9
Next: Telecom provider 2017 - Ecology Question 1


Question

Has the brand (owner) set a target to make at least its own operations fully climate neutral by 2030, and is the brand on track to achieve this target?

NL: Heeft het merk (bedrijf) zich tot doel gesteld om in ieder geval al zijn eigen operaties uiterlijk in 2030 volledig klimaatneutraal te maken, en loopt het op schema om dit doel te behalen?

DE: Verfolgt der Markenhersteller Klimaneutralität bis 2030 als Ziel für den eigenen Betrieb? Ist dieses Ziel mit umgesetzten Maßnahmen positiv hinterlegt?

Reference

This question relates to Disclosures 305-1, 305-2, and 305-5 of the Global Reporting Initiative, to Criterion 3 'Objectives' of the Sustainability Code from the German Council of Sustainable Development, to the UN Sustainable Development Goal 13 and to the Paris Agreement.

‘Own operations’ are defined by ‘Scope 1 & 2’ of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol (refer to [1] for the definition of what is included in 'Scope 1 & 2'). Note: as an exception, you can also reward a "Yes" to a brand / company when energy sources (e.g. wind, solar or hydro) for electricity supply are 100% sustainable. If brands / companies have already (almost) achieved climate neutrality, then there are no further reductions to be made as a result of an already sustainable and/or renewables-based energy source. However, some sustainable energy sources, e.g. biomass such as wood, emit greenhouse gas emissions too. For those emissions, if applicable, it is required to compensate them or reduce them to the specified level via carbon offsets.

Important conditions to reward a "Yes" include the following:

  • Clear progress towards climate neutrality in 2030 (i.e., the brand/company cannot indicate that it will achieve this target having not shown any progress thus far). For example, companies could aim to emit in 2020 only half the amount of greenhouse gases as in 2010, and in 2025 only a quarter (cf. link, page 53.
  • For brands/companies opting to compensate for emissions to reach climate neutrality by 2030, clear statements regarding the source of these credits, additionality, leakage, source, tracking progress etc. are required. See the Carbon Fund website for more information.
  • Actions, initiatives, etc. should be discussed that would indicate progress towards a 2030 goal, thus demonstrating the company is not just discussing this target, but also implementing concrete means to achieve it.

Ranking Guidelines

Yes:

- The company provides a timetable for how they propose they will achieve climate neutrality by 2030 (i.e. what percentage per year, when they will reach the target accordingly), and is on schedule to reach this target.

- The company already achieved climate neutrality by using sustainable/renewable energy or compensating its greenhouse gas emissions(using a credible carbon offset program. For compensated greenhouse emissions via carbon offsets, the company should report concrete details with regard to type, additionality, numbers and/or projects, leakage, tracking progress, etc.


?:

-No information is given at all or no climate neutrality target is mentioned.

-No percentage or year is given in the timeline for achieving the climate neutrality target.

-Information on the use of sustainable/renewable energy and / or carbon offsets are not concrete with regard to type, additionality, numbers and / or projects, leakage, tracking progress, etc.

-The company aims to be climate neutral by 2030, but is falling behind schedule.


No:

- The brand/company states to not have a goal/target to achieve climate neutrality, or to achieve it at a date later than 2030.

Answering Guidelines

Yes:

  • [Brand] has set a target to achieve climate neutrality by 2030 or before, and is on track to do so as evidenced by [the following concrete measures, timetable, progress to date, etc.].
  • [Brand] aims to achieve climate neutrality by 2030 by reducing and/or compensating [its yearly emissions by …% per year, using […] as a base year / …*] and is so far [on / ahead of*] schedule.
  • [Brand] uses 100% renewable energy for its own operations, namely [e.g. wind / solar / hydro*]. The remaining inevitable greenhouse gas emissions are compensated by [compensation project].
  • [Brand] has already reduced its annual greenhouse gas emissions to a minimum, namely by using renewable energy for its own operations only and the compensation of inevitable emissions through credible carbon offset programs.


No:

  • [Brand] has set a target to reduce only [..]% of its climate footprint by [year].
  • [Brand] states that no concrete greenhouse gas emissions reduction target has been set.


?:

  • [Brand] mentions it has a target to achieve climate neutrality, but does not specify the target year.
  • [Brand] mentions it has a target to reduce its absolute climate footprint, but this is a relative reduction goal only [specify its relative reduction goal*].
  • [Brand] does not communicate any information on its climate footprint towards a climate neutrality goal for its own operations.
  • [Brand] does not communicate up to date [within 2 years, i.e., the target year has already passed] target reductions for its [climate footprint/greenhouse gas emissions*] of its own operations.
  • [Brand] mentions to use renewable energy for its entire energy supply, but does not report concrete information with regard to [type of energy and / or additionality / compensation of the remaining inevitable greenhouse gas emissions*].

-* You can pick the topic that applies to 'your' brand.

Note: when linking to a downloadable source document, please refer to the page(s) where to find the respective information with: (see link, page [..]).

Optional, but only for ? Answers, feel free to write at the end of a remark: Sustainability information should be easily accessible for consumers to make responsible choices.