Difference between revisions of "Telecom provider 2017 - Ecology Question 2"

From RankaBrand
Jump to: navigation, search
(Ranking Guidelines)
(Question)
 
Line 10: Line 10:
 
NL: Publiceert het merk (bedrijf) de absolute ‘voetafdruk’ van zijn afvalmaterialen en heeft het zijn voetafdruk ten opzichte van het voorafgaande verslagjaar verminderd?
 
NL: Publiceert het merk (bedrijf) de absolute ‘voetafdruk’ van zijn afvalmaterialen en heeft het zijn voetafdruk ten opzichte van het voorafgaande verslagjaar verminderd?
  
DE:
+
DE: Setzt der Markenhersteller Maßnahmen zur Verringerung der Umweltbelastung durch die betriebseigene Abfallerzeugung um? Wurde die Abfallbilanz im Vergleich zum letzten Berichtsjahr reduziert?
  
 
===Reference===
 
===Reference===

Latest revision as of 06:14, 5 April 2018

<<back to Telecom provider question list.
Previous: Telecom provider 2017 - Ecology Question 1
Next: Telecom provider 2017 - Ecology Question 3


Question

Does the brand (owner) publish its absolute waste materials footprint and has it decreased its waste footprint compared to the previous reporting year?

NL: Publiceert het merk (bedrijf) de absolute ‘voetafdruk’ van zijn afvalmaterialen en heeft het zijn voetafdruk ten opzichte van het voorafgaande verslagjaar verminderd?

DE: Setzt der Markenhersteller Maßnahmen zur Verringerung der Umweltbelastung durch die betriebseigene Abfallerzeugung um? Wurde die Abfallbilanz im Vergleich zum letzten Berichtsjahr reduziert?

Reference

Transitioning to a circular economy also requires that waste is minimized and processed responsibly. For this question, we do not focus on consumer packaging, but on waste generated by the company itself, be it in the production process, in the office space, or elsewhere. Like consumer packaging, company waste may create serious environmental impacts when dumped on a landfill, such as spontaneous combustion and soil/groundwater contamination, but on top of that waste from companies may have a particularly serious environmental impact, for example because some of it may be hazardous. In particular, e-waste is infamous for ending up in third world countries and for the adverse effects it may have there on human health.

For this question, we therefore ask companies, according to Disclosure 306-2 of the Global Reporting Initiative, and in line with Criterion 11 'Usage of Natural Resources' and 12 'Resource Management' of the Sustainability Code from the German Council of Sustainable Development to report their total amount of waste in tons by </i>type (e.g., biodegradable, recyclable, etc., or hazardous vs. non-hazardous), to report the weight or volume of each category, and to report the applied disposal methods (e.g., recycling, incineration, landfill, etc.). When a company reports these three metrics (type, weight/volume, disposal method), we consider this as the company reporting its waste footprint.

While we hope that companies will eventually manage to incorporate a zero landfill policy or even become fully circular (see also next two questions), for now we ask here only for a reduction in absolute waste compared to the previous reporting year.

Ranking Guidelines

Answer Yes:

  • [Brand] reports the annual waste by type (e.g., hazardous and non-hazardous), weight (or volume) and way of disposal (e.g., recycling, landfill)

AND

  • [Brand] reports less waste than in the previous year. Net waste reductions can be expressed as an absolute figure (weight or volume) or relative to the quantity of sold product (weight or volume per weight or volume). Alternatively, brand already reports recycling 100% of its waste, with 0% waste being incinerated or sent to landfill.

Note: Mobile phones from customers that are collected for recycling or reuse do not count as waste in our calculation, as this is a behaviour that we want to encourage.


Answer No:

  • [Brand] states that it publishes no waste footprint.
  • [Brand] states that it has [increased/maintained] its absolute annual waste footprint between [previous reporting year] and [current reporting year].


Answer ?:

  • [Brand] does not communicate any information regarding its waste generation.
  • [Brand] does not communicate any information about its waste reduction policies.
  • [Brand] communicates a waste reduction policy, but does not report the overall performance.
  • [Brand] does not report on the annual results of its waste reduction policy.
  • [Brand] mentions it is active in waste separation and recycling. However, annual results of its waste reduction policy are not specified.
  • [Brand] implements several measures to reduce its annual absolute waste footprint, such as [provide example]. But, concrete aggregate results regarding its annual absolute waste footprint are not made public.
  • [Brand] implements several measures to reduce its annual absolute waste footprint, and that it has reduced its [net waste, food waste, etc.*] by [result*]. But, a concrete, annual absolute waste footprint is not made public
  • [Brand owner] implements several measures to reduce the annual absolute waste footprint of its brand [Brand], such as [provide example]. But, concrete aggregate results regarding its annual absolute waste footprint are not made public.

Answering Guidelines

Answer Yes:

  • [Brand] reports its annual waste by type, weight and way of disposal and has reduced its annual absolute waste footprint in [current reporting year] compared with [previous reporting year] (see link/page...).
  • [Brand] reports its annual waste by type, weight and way of disposal and has reduced its annual absolute waste footprint from [Amount] tons in [previous reporting year] to [Amount] in[previous reporting year] (see link/page...).
  • [Brand] reports an annual absolute waste footprint of [...] tons in [current reporting year], which is a […]% reduction compared to [previous reporting year] (see link/page...).


Answer No:

  • [Brand] states that it publishes no waste footprint.
  • [Brand] states that it has [increased/maintained] its absolute annual waste footprint between [previous reporting year] and [current reporting year].


Answer ?:

  • [Brand] does not communicate any information regarding its waste generation.
  • [Brand] does not communicate any information about its waste reduction policies.
  • [Brand] communicates a waste reduction policy, but does not report the overall performance.
  • [Brand] does not report on the annual results of its waste reduction policy.
  • [Brand] mentions it is active in waste separation and recycling. However, annual results of its waste reduction policy are not specified.
  • [Brand] implements several measures to reduce its annual absolute waste footprint, such as [provide example]. But, concrete aggregate results regarding its annual absolute waste footprint are not made public.
  • [Brand] implements several measures to reduce its annual absolute waste footprint, and that it has reduced its [net waste, food waste, etc.*] by [result*]. But, a concrete, annual absolute waste footprint is not made public
  • [Brand owner] implements several measures to reduce the annual absolute waste footprint of its brand [Brand], such as [provide example]. But, concrete aggregate results regarding its annual absolute waste footprint are not made public.

-* You can pick the topic that applies to 'your' brand. Note: when linking to a downloadable source document, please refer to the page(s) where to find the respective information with: (see link, page [..]). Optional, but only for ? Answers, feel free to write at the end of a remark: Sustainability information should be easily accessible for consumers to make responsible choices.